The dataset, not just the conclusions
Every guide in this category tells you what dolls cost and how much they weigh. None of them show you the rows. Here are ours — the same 42 listings our price and weight findings are computed from, as JSON and CSV, free to download, check, disagree with, or reuse commercially.
Download
- doll-specs.json — full dataset with embedded documentation, field definitions and limitations
- doll-specs.csv — the same rows, spreadsheet-ready
Licence: CC BY 4.0. Use it commercially, quote it, rebuild our charts, publish a correction to them. Attribution to thedollscout.com is all we ask, and no permission is needed.
What is in it
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
title | Vendor's product title, verbatim |
url | Product page — no referral parameters on these |
heightCm | Vendor-stated height, centimetres |
weightKg / weightLb | Vendor-stated weight |
priceUsd | Listed price on the recording date, including any sale price |
isPartialBody | True for torsos and other partial bodies |
33 rows are full-size dolls, 9 are partial bodies. Prices span $209 to $2,659. What we concluded from them: the price bands, including the empty one, and why height barely predicts weight.
What is wrong with it
Stated here rather than buried, because a dataset that hides its weaknesses is marketing:
- Vendor-stated, not independently measured. We did not weigh anything. Repeated models returned identical figures across separate listings, which is what real specification data looks like — but it is still the vendor's number.
- One vendor. This is a sample of one catalogue, not of the market. Treat cross-vendor generalisations as unsupported.
- Prices drift. Sale prices are included as displayed. The bands are durable; the exact figures are a snapshot.
- No material column, deliberately. The collection could not reliably tell TPE from silicone on these listings. A material column would have been a guess wearing a data label, so there isn't one. This is the omission we are most often asked about.
- Editorial exclusions. Listings under 140 cm are excluded unless explicitly a partial body — a safety rule, not a data-quality one. Accessory listings are excluded because their pages carry the spec table of the doll they fit, which once produced a spurious full-size row at accessory pricing.
If you find an error
Tell us. We have already corrected one of our own published numbers in public — our torso weight range was wrong, the data said so, and the guide now says we corrected it. That is the standard this dataset is published under.